Showing posts with label Victim Blaming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victim Blaming. Show all posts

Friday, April 19, 2024

Book Review - David Bushman and Mark T. Givens's Murder at Teal's Pond

Murder at Teal's Pond: Hazel Drew and the Mystery That Inspired Twin Peaks by David Bushman and Mark T. Givens
Published by: Thomas and Mercer
Publication Date: December 28th, 2021
Format: Hardcover, 335 Pages
Rating: ★★
To Buy

Hazel Drew wasn't found wrapped in plastic. She was found floating in a pond in Sand Lake, New York, on July 7th, 1908 by a group of campers. She had been beaten to death. But there was never a verdict of murder, there was one of suicide. Which suited everyone with something to hide just fine. She lived in Troy, New York, only fourteen miles from where her body was found, and that is where her death was hushed up. The town was staunchly Republican and the politics of the town were mired in corruption. As was the police. They had no interest in discovering what really happened to Hazel Drew. Instead they barely investigated at all, listening to unreliable witnesses, going after red herrings, and a wild goose or two. They never worked diligently to follow up promising leads instead focusing on impugning the reputation of Hazel herself. The victim blaming wasn't hard, she had an unsavory past and it is quite possible she was blackmailing the wealthy of Troy. But does that mean her murder should be hushed up? Yes it does. Because the truth is dangerous, as was the spectacle her death caused, with newspapers rushing reporters to the scene. And murder in a small town means one thing, that that small town isn't as it appears. Troy wanted to be viewed as the perfect American town. But underneath they were anything but. And Hazel got in their way, Hazel knew their secrets. Because in the end that is what so many murders come down to. Who are you endangering by continuing to live? Hazel was dangerous to someone. Perhaps someone powerful. Therefore her case was hushed up and forgotten about. Though stories still persisted. Urban legends and ghost stories. Mark Frost spent summers near Teal's Pond and his grandmother would tell him stories about the unsolved murder of the beautiful young girl. An idea planted in his head long ago that would evolve into the murder of Laura Palmer that had America transfixed. While Laura got her justice isn't it about time Hazel got hers?

I picked up this book for one reason and one reason only, it's supposed connection to Twin Peaks. I honestly can say I think this was all a marketing ploy by the writers. Sure, they somehow got Mark Frost to write a forward, but throughout that forward he's saying how he really didn't use Hazel Drew's murder for inspiration at all. Um... So... Why do the forward then? Your grandmother told you an urban legend once and it kind of stuck? I mean, I do think that Frost was inspired by this case, I just think it's connection is tenuous and was used to sell a very boring and inconclusive true crime book. Also, having someone who is a legit writer write your forward and then following it up with amateurish and repetitive writing, that's not a good look. The thing is, this book does a good job of setting up the time period. You get an indepth look at the history of Troy and how it was indicative of small town America at the turn of the last century. But that's all it does. Instead of writing the story chronologically they decided to go thematically. OK, that's a choice. I'm not saying it's the right one but it is one. I'll Be Gone in the Dark by Michelle McNamara took a similar approach. But you know what she did so she wouldn't confuse her readers? She had an actual timeline of the investigation right at the front of the book. You know, where it would have been nice to actually have a map as well... As for "solving" the case? Can drawing a valid conclusion without actually supporting it with any new evidence be called solving it? You have a fine line to thread when writing true crime, especially when dealing with cold cases. You actually have to give the reader something to justify their time and energy. Going back to Michelle McNamara, her work literally caught The Golden State Killer. Sure, the investigation was heading in the right direction and pieces were being put in place, but without her, without her pushing, without her constantly keeping the focus on those cases would it have been solved? Well, I can't honestly say, but I think she is what might have been the missing piece. Her dedication. Her resolve. Here we don't get anything from the authors. At the very least we should have felt a connection to Hazel. The authors say at the very end that this book was about Hazel. It wasn't. It was about powerful white men doing what they've always done, removing roadblocks in their way. Either find the killer and present them to the cold light of day or shine a light on the life that was lost. In other words, don't do this.

Wednesday, August 31, 2022

Book Review - Georgette Heyer's The Quiet Gentleman

The Quiet Gentleman by Georgette Heyer
Published by: HQN Books
Publication Date: 1951
Format: Paperback, 352 Pages
Rating: ★★★
To Buy

Gervase Frant had the temerity to survive the Napoleonic Wars. This was a blow to his stepmother and in particular her hopes for his younger half-brother Martin, whom she has reared as if he were going to be the Earl, in spite of primogeniture. To add insult to lack of injury, for a full year after he ascended to be the Earl of St. Erth he wandered around the continent instead of returning to Stanyon to take up his duties. He flippantly claims it was to avoid wearing mourning, but his dandified ways bely the solider he is underneath his perfectly tailored clothes from Weston's. Though one thing is clear, he's going to have an uphill battle with the denizens of Stanyon Castle. He has avoided his "home" as much as he could throughout his life, spending holidays with his maternal grandmother, but now he must face his family and their guests; Mr. Clowne, the chaplain is an unknown quantity, and Miss Morville, a kind neighbor who is acting as companion to Gervase's stepmother, seems to have her head on her shoulders. In fact it's only Theo, his cousin, who has acted as steward for the family, who Gervase is excited to see. Theo is reliable, dependable, and a true friend. There is a tenuous peace that proceeds Gervas's return. A peace that is shattered when he helps out a becoming neighbor, Miss Marianne Bolderwood. Martin only has eyes for her and now Marianne only has eyes for St. Erth. This is not a sustainable situation, and soon things come to a head. As in there are attempts on St. Erth's life. The first attempt could have been imagined, the second could have been written off as an accident waiting to happen, the third attempt was only unsuccessful due to Miss Morville and her swift actions. The attacks are gaining in severity and it is clear that someone wants Gervase dead. But could Martin really be this clever? To get ride of a romantic rival AND ascend to Earl all in one convenient death? Only time will tell, and hopefully Gervase will be around to see how things play out.

The Quiet Gentleman is perhaps the closest to Austen any of Heyer's books I've read this year has come. Though told from a male point of view. In fact I find it rather interesting that all her books that I've read have a masculine viewpoint. That will be something to mull over and look for as I read more of her books. Though my experience with Heyer is she's very hit or miss. I've not found one I love, but I've found some I've loathed, and this one I really like in spite of itself. The Quiet Gentleman has so much going for it but then there's Martin and Marianne. I have major problems with the two of them. Twice Martin forces his attentions on Marianne and both times she comes away shocked and believing Martin's unwanted attention was her fault. A belief that those around her don't contradict and in fact encourage her to just shake off and act normal around Martin. Well, acting normal around Martin led to her being accosted a second time! She was the vicitim. This wasn't her fault AT ALL! I mean, yes, this book was written in the fifties, so victim blaming was at it's height, but dear me it made me angry and uncomfortable. Marianne is a vivacious free spirit and this somehow was her leading Martin on? She was naive, unworldly, and cossetted, how could she expect a man she'd known almost her whole life to just make passionate love to her and force his advances on her? Now it should be made clear he just said things to her that she didn't want to hear and kissed her. But this is still an assault. Especially given the time period. And Marianne blames herself. She blames herself for being a flirt, for being pretty, the light goes out of her and her behavior to everyone changes. She was traumatized and no one really helped her. Yes, there's so much of the book that is just like Austen and is fun matchmaking, but there's this dark underbelly of victim blaming that forever changes a young girl that for the life of me I can not in good conscience fully embrace this book. Especially the denouement which is all about Martin's rehabilitation in the eyes of his cousin. Treat everyone, especially women, with the respect you yourself expect. No exceptions.

Older Posts Home